Live Free Kentucky
  • Home
  • Libertarianism 101
  • Anarchy 2020
  • Archives
    • 2019 Consolidated
    • Campaign 2018
    • Lobby 2017
    • Campaign 2016
    • Lobby 2016/15/14

Libertarian Party Continues To grow in kentucky



Find out more about LPKY

Federal Judge Rules Against Kentucky Libertarians' Plea For Ballot Equality in Public Debate

10/12/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Recently, a Libertarian Trifecta comprised of The Libertarian National Committee, The Libertarian Party of Kentucky & Libertarian Senatorial Candidate David Patterson filed suit against Kentucky Educational Television a PBS Affiliate for gerrymandering public debate inclusion criteria to exclude David Patterson due to his 3rd party political affiliation and personal views thereby infringing on his 1st amendment right to free speech. This weekend Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove, a McConnell Donor, officially ruled against Kentuckians right to equal & democratic representation in public contest for nonpartisan &/or 3rd party candidates legitimately on the ballot.

According to a Press Release from the Libertarian Party of Kentucky on October 11th:

[Oligarchy Wins. Kentucky Loses.

Libertarians suffered a major setback in their lawsuit against KET on Saturday. David Patterson, the Libertarian candidate for United States Senate, will not be allowed to participate in Monday's debate.

Judge Van Tatenhove issued a ruling against the emergency injunction filed by the Libertarian Party of Kentucky and the campaign of David Patterson for United States Senate on Saturday. LPKY and Patterson had filed suit against KET after an Open Records Request showed that KET continually shifted criteria for inclusion in Monday's debate.

David Patterson expressed frustration with the ruling. “I'm running the best campaign that I can. I don't have $50M worth of out-of-state special interest money. My campaign has always been about regular Kentuckians, and that's who has lost today. KET has testified under oath that their mission and values statements don't apply to the decisions they make. They intend to apply a financial threshold to all future criteria. That means you must be rich or have rich friends to even stand a chance. Kentuckians now have their hard-earned tax dollars being used to deprive them of knowing their options when they walk into the ballot box.”

Ken Moellman, State Chair of the Libertarian Party, expressed disgust. “It is extremely disappointing that the court has said state entities can re-write the rules in the middle of the game. KET testified under oath that Grimes and McConnell were invited without any criteria, while David Patterson was scrutinized under an ever-increasing set of criteria. This isn't even about Libertarians, it's everyone who's not part of the Old Parties. The First Amendment now only applies to the 'chosen ones'. Welcome to the illusion of choice. Welcome to the oligarchy.”

LPKY State Vice Chair Dave Capano said, “The battle for Liberty in Kentucky is far from over. While this ruling is disappointing, it just adds fuel to the fire that brings more Kentuckians to our cause. This verdict is just more proof as to just how our system works and why we will continue to be the change the country is looking for.”

Despite his exclusion, Patterson will be on the ballot for United States Senate, in addition to other Libertarians seeking various local office throughout the state.

KET will present a debate with 2/3rds of the ballot-listed candidates on Monday, depriving Kentuckians of the opportunity to learn about 1/3rd of their choices.]

Kentuckians are showing their discontent for establishment politics in many ways ranging from tweeting to trolling online but rest assured officially unofficial protest are in the works as well. Don't let your voice go unheard if your feel strongly about the establishment's desecration of democracy in Kentucky.

Picture
1 Comment
Mitch Pelley link
10/12/2014 09:03:04 am

KET, is clearly wrong on this one! I'll skip the Debate! This makes no sense whatsoever, seems to me, to be un American? Why would I watch something that clearly 1/3 of the People are missing?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    COntributing Editors
    ​May Vary

    Archives

    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.